↓ Skip to main content

Murine Th9 cells promote the survival of myeloid dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Murine Th9 cells promote the survival of myeloid dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00262-014-1557-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jungsun Park, Haiyan Li, Mingjun Zhang, Yong Lu, Bangxing Hong, Yuhuan Zheng, Jin He, Jing Yang, Jianfei Qian, Qing Yi

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells to initiate immune responses, and DC survival time is important for affecting the strength of T-cell responses. Interleukin (IL)-9-producing T-helper (Th)-9 cells play an important role in anti-tumor immunity. However, it is unclear how Th9 cells communicate with DCs. In this study, we investigated whether murine Th9 cells affected the survival of myeloid DCs. DCs derived from bone marrow of C57BL/6 mice were cocultured with Th9 cells from OT-II mice using transwell, and the survival of DCs was examined. DCs cocultured with Th9 cells had longer survival and fewer apoptotic cells than DCs cultured alone in vitro. In melanoma B16-OVA tumor-bearing mice, DCs conditioned by Th9 cells lived longer and induced stronger anti-tumor response than control DCs did in vivo. Mechanistic studies revealed that IL-3 but not IL-9 secreted by Th9 cells was responsible for the prolonged survival of DCs. IL-3 upregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL and activated p38, ERK and STAT5 signaling pathways in DCs. Taken together, our data provide the first evidence that Th9 cells can promote the survival of DCs through IL-3, and will be helpful for designing Th9 cell immunotherapy and more effective DC vaccine for human cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,431,072
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#2,001
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,154
of 227,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.