↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Open reduction and closed reduction internal fixation in treatment of femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Open reduction and closed reduction internal fixation in treatment of femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weiguo Wang, Junjie Wei, Zhanwang Xu, Wenkun Zhuo, Yuan Zhang, Hui Rong, Xuecheng Cao, Pingshan Wang

Abstract

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between healing rate, avascular necrosis (AVN) of femoral head and two reductions-open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF) for femoral neck fracture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,683,641
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,199
of 4,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,131
of 227,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#46
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.