Title |
Isolation and characterization of thermostable phycocyanin from Galdieria sulphuraria
|
---|---|
Published in |
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11814-013-0239-9 |
Authors |
Myounghoon Moon, Sanjiv K. Mishra, Chul Woong Kim, William I. Suh, Min S. Park, Ji-Won Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 19% |
Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,698,419
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#2
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,075
of 333,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them