↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning after assistance for refractory cardiogenic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
51 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
290 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Predictors of successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning after assistance for refractory cardiogenic shock
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2358-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia Aissaoui, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Pascal Leprince, Jean-Louis Trouillet, Philippe Léger, Alain Pavie, Benoit Diebold, Jean Chastre, Alain Combes

Abstract

Detailed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning strategies and specific predictors of ECMO weaning success are lacking. This study evaluated a weaning strategy following support for refractory cardiogenic shock to identify clinical, hemodynamic, and Doppler echocardiography parameters associated with successful ECMO removal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 18%
Other 36 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Master 16 8%
Other 55 26%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,076,185
of 24,870,516 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#997
of 5,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,461
of 136,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,870,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.