↓ Skip to main content

Depression and poverty among African American women at risk for type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Depression and poverty among African American women at risk for type 2 diabetes
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2003
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2503_03
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary de Groot, Wendy Auslanden, James Herbert Williams, Michael Sherraden, Debra Haire-Joshu

Abstract

Poverty is associated with negative health outcomes, including depression. Little is known about the specific elements of poverty that contribute to depression, particularly among African American women at risk for type 2 diabetes. This study examined the relationships of economic and social resources to depression among African American women at high risk for the development of type 2 diabetes (N = 181) using the Conservation of Resources theory as a conceptual framework. Women were assessed at 3 time points in conjunction with a dietary change intervention. At baseline, 40% of women reported clinically significant depression, and 43.3% were below the poverty line. Depressed women reported fewer economic assets and greater economic distress than nondepressed peers. Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that nonwork status, lack of home ownership, low appraisal of one's economic situation, low self-esteem, and increased life events were significantly associated with depression at baseline. Longitudinal multivariate logistic regression models indicated that income, home ownership, future economic appraisal, life events, and self-esteem predicted depression trajectories at Time 3. These results speak to the multifaceted sources of stress in the lives of poor African American women. Interventions that address the economic and social factors associated with depression are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,196,440
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#994
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,701
of 50,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.