↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: A method to assign sex to leopard Panthera pardus specimens using quantitative cranial data

Overview of attention for article published in Zoomorphology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 400)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A method to assign sex to leopard Panthera pardus specimens using quantitative cranial data
Published in
Zoomorphology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00435-013-0214-3
Authors

Igor Khorozyan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,095,144
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Zoomorphology
#44
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,023
of 304,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoomorphology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them