| Title |
A pilot study on safety and clinical utility of a single-use 72-hour indwelling transesophageal echocardiography probe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2797-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Michel Slama, Paul Mayo, Cyril Charron, Jean-Bernard Amiel, Cédric Esterez, François Leleu, Xavier Repesse, Philippe Vignon |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the hemodynamic monitoring capability and safety of a single-use miniaturized transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe left in place in ventilated critically ill patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 64% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,222,487
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,570
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,661
of 280,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.