↓ Skip to main content

The 4-2-1 family structure in China: a survival analysis based on life tables

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Ageing, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 361)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
The 4-2-1 family structure in China: a survival analysis based on life tables
Published in
European Journal of Ageing, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10433-011-0189-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quanbao Jiang, Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte

Abstract

Concern about ensuring old-age support in 4-2-1 families-consisting of four older people (paternal and maternal grandparents), two parents, and only one child-has risen with the increase in the number of families with only one child. In this article, using life table data and probability theory, we examine survival probabilities and coexistence durations for China's 4-2-1 family structure, as well as urban and rural differences and conduct a sensitivity analysis. We find that once the grandparents have all entered the "old-age" phase (over 60 years old), the probability that all four will survive is only 0.61. The four grandparents are likely to coexist for 16 years after the birth of their grandchild, then one will die and the remaining three will probably spend another 8 years together; finally, after another dies, the surviving two will coexist for another 5 years. There is no significant difference between urban and rural families in terms of the duration of their coexistence. As the ages at which the parents had their child rise, the durations become shorter. The pressure of old-age support in such families is not as severe as expected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 30%
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#153,842
of 24,287,598 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Ageing
#1
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#420
of 114,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Ageing
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them