↓ Skip to main content

A Longitudinal Examination of the Relation Between Parental Expressed Emotion and Externalizing Behaviors in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
A Longitudinal Examination of the Relation Between Parental Expressed Emotion and Externalizing Behaviors in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2142-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie H. Bader, Tammy D. Barry

Abstract

The current study explored the longitudinal relation between parental expressed emotion, a well-established predictor of symptom relapse in various other disorders (e.g., schizophrenia) with externalizing behaviors in 84 children, ages 8-18 (at Time 2), with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It was found that parental expressed emotion, specifically criticism/hostility at Time 1, significantly related to a change in externalizing behaviors from Time 1 to Time 2, even after controlling for Time 1 family income, ASD symptom severity, parental distress, and parenting practices. That is, higher levels of parental criticism/hostility at Time 1 predicted higher levels of child externalizing behaviors at Time 2. However, the reverse was not found. This finding of a unidirectional relation has important clinical implications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 23%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,695,837
of 24,135,931 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,327
of 5,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,041
of 230,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#37
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,135,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.