↓ Skip to main content

Student Learning about Biomolecular Self-Assembly Using Two Different External Representations

Overview of attention for article published in CBE—Life Sciences Education, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Student Learning about Biomolecular Self-Assembly Using Two Different External Representations
Published in
CBE—Life Sciences Education, September 2013
DOI 10.1187/cbe.13-01-0011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunnar E. Höst, Caroline Larsson, Arthur Olson, Lena A. E. Tibell

Abstract

Self-assembly is the fundamental but counterintuitive principle that explains how ordered biomolecular complexes form spontaneously in the cell. This study investigated the impact of using two external representations of virus self-assembly, an interactive tangible three-dimensional model and a static two-dimensional image, on student learning about the process of self-assembly in a group exercise. A conceptual analysis of self-assembly into a set of facets was performed to support study design and analysis. Written responses were collected in a pretest/posttest experimental design with 32 Swedish university students. A quantitative analysis of close-ended items indicated that the students improved their scores between pretest and posttest, with no significant difference between the conditions (tangible model/image). A qualitative analysis of an open-ended item indicated students were unfamiliar with self-assembly prior to the study. Students in the tangible model condition used the facets of self-assembly in their open-ended posttest responses more frequently than students in the image condition. In particular, it appears that the dynamic properties of the tangible model may support student understanding of self-assembly in terms of the random and reversible nature of molecular interactions. A tentative difference was observed in response complexity, with more multifaceted responses in the tangible model condition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 29%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Social Sciences 7 16%
Psychology 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 24%