Title |
The Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Predictor of Survival After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-013-3342-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kazuya Nakagawa, Kuniya Tanaka, Kazunori Nojiri, Takafumi Kumamoto, Kazuhisa Takeda, Michio Ueda, Itaru Endo |
Abstract |
The inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) has been demonstrated to be prognostic for various tumors. We investigated the value of the modified GPS (mGPS) for the prognosis of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 33% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 26% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 60% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,915,695
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3,960
of 6,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,658
of 305,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#38
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.