| Title |
A prospective, blinded evaluation of a video-assisted ‘4-stage approach’ during undergraduate student practical skills training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrin Schwerdtfeger, Saskia Wand, Oliver Schmid, Markus Roessler, Michael Quintel, Kay B Leissner, Sebastian G Russo |
| Abstract |
The 4-stage approach (4-SA) is used as a didactic method for teaching practical skills in international courses on resuscitation and the structured care of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate objective and subjective learning success of a video-assisted 4-SA in teaching undergraduate medical students. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,638,545
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,994
of 3,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,902
of 228,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#36
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.