↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes as risk factor for incident coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 coronary events

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
500 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diabetes as risk factor for incident coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 coronary events
Published in
Diabetologia, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00125-014-3260-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanne A. E. Peters, Rachel R. Huxley, Mark Woodward

Abstract

A previous pooled analysis suggested that women with diabetes are at substantially increased risk of fatal CHD compared with affected men. Additional findings from several larger and more contemporary studies have since been published on the sex-specific associations between diabetes and incident CHD. We performed an updated systematic review with meta-analysis to provide the most reliable evidence of any sex difference in the effect of diabetes on subsequent risk of CHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 344 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Master 39 11%
Other 28 8%
Other 70 20%
Unknown 78 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 102 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#308,573
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#180
of 5,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,498
of 244,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#4
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.