| Title |
Disk Evolution and the Fate of Water
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-017-0406-0 |
| Authors |
Lee Hartmann, Fred Ciesla, Oliver Gressel, Richard Alexander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 41% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#19,225,498
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#985
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,532
of 318,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.