↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Treatments and New Therapeutic Perspective in GLUT1 Deficiency Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Dietary Treatments and New Therapeutic Perspective in GLUT1 Deficiency Syndrome
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11940-014-0291-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierangelo Veggiotti, Valentina De Giorgis

Abstract

GLUT1 deficiency syndrome (GLUT1DS) results from impaired glucose transport into the brain: awareness of its wide phenotypic spectrum is a prerequisite in order to ensure an early diagnosis, treating the patients is the subsequent challenge to allow prompt compensation for the brain's lack of fuel. The ketogenic diet (KD) plays a primary role in the treatment of GLUT1DS because it provides ketone bodies as an alternative source to meet the demands of energy of the brain. Therefore, we recommend early initiation of the KD based on the assumption that early diagnosis and treatment improves the long term neurological outcome: the classic KD (4:1 or 3:1) at the present time is the most proven and effective in GLUT1DS. A KD should be continued at least until adolescence, although there are reports of good tolerability even in adulthood, possibly with a less rigorous ratio; in our experience seizure and movement disorder control can be achieved by a 2:1 ketogenic ratio but the relationship between ketosis and neurodevelopmental outcome remains undetermined. Other types of KDs can, therefore, be considered. The Modified Atkins diet, for example, is also well tolerated and provides effective symptom control; furthermore, this diet has the advantage of being easy to prepare and more palatable, which are important requirements for good compliance. Nevertheless, about 20 % of these patients have compliance trouble or the same diet loses its effectiveness over time; for these reasons, new therapeutic strategies are currently under investigation but further studies on pathophysiological mechanisms and potential effects of novel "diets" or "therapies" are needed for this new pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,301,167
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#301
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,330
of 221,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.