You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2011.0108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerrie A. Wilson, Megan C. Evans, Moreno Di Marco, David C. Green, Luigi Boitani, Hugh P. Possingham, Federica Chiozza, Carlo Rondinini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 212 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 63 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 136 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 63 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,671,803
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,463
of 7,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,674
of 143,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.