↓ Skip to main content

Enthalpy/Entropy Compensation Effects from Cavity Desolvation Underpin Broad Ligand Binding Selectivity for Rat Odorant Binding Protein 3

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enthalpy/Entropy Compensation Effects from Cavity Desolvation Underpin Broad Ligand Binding Selectivity for Rat Odorant Binding Protein 3
Published in
Biochemistry, April 2014
DOI 10.1021/bi5002344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine L. Portman, Jed Long, Stephen Carr, Loïc Briand, Donald J. Winzor, Mark S. Searle, David J. Scott

Abstract

Evolution has produced proteins with exquisite ligand binding specificity, and manipulating this effect has been the basis for much of modern rational drug design. However, there are general classes of proteins with broader ligand selectivity linked to function, the origin of which is poorly understood. The odorant binding proteins (OBPs) sequester volatile molecules for transportation to the olfactory receptors. Rat OBP3, which we characterize by X-ray crystallography and NMR, binds a homologous series of aliphatic γ-lactones within its aromatic-rich hydrophobic pocket with remarkably little variation in affinity but extensive enthalpy/entropy compensation effects. We show that the binding energetics are modulated by two desolvation processes with quite different thermodynamic signatures. Ligand desolvation follows the classical hydrophobic effect; however, cavity desolvation is consistent with the liberation of "high energy" water molecules back into bulk solvent with a strong, but compensated, enthalpic contribution, which together underpin the origins of broad ligand binding selectivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 24%
Chemistry 12 21%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,544,445
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#18,806
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,213
of 232,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#46
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.