↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
Title
Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00359-007-0235-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Giurfa

Abstract

Equipped with a mini brain smaller than one cubic millimeter and containing only 950,000 neurons, honeybees could be indeed considered as having rather limited cognitive abilities. However, bees display a rich and interesting behavioral repertoire, in which learning and memory play a fundamental role in the framework of foraging activities. We focus on the question of whether adaptive behavior in honeybees exceeds simple forms of learning and whether the neural mechanisms of complex learning can be unraveled by studying the honeybee brain. Besides elemental forms of learning, in which bees learn specific and univocal links between events in their environment, bees also master different forms of non-elemental learning, including categorization, contextual learning and rule abstraction, both in the visual and in the olfactory domain. Different protocols allow accessing the neural substrates of some of these learning forms and understanding how complex problem solving can be achieved by a relatively simple neural architecture. These results underline the enormous richness of experience-dependent behavior in honeybees, its high flexibility, and the fact that it is possible to formalize and characterize in controlled laboratory protocols basic and higher-order cognitive processing using an insect as a model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 15 3%
United States 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 415 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 24%
Researcher 85 19%
Student > Master 68 15%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 46 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 288 64%
Neuroscience 32 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Environmental Science 11 2%
Psychology 10 2%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 58 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,764,072
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#401
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,080
of 55,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.