↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of non‐radiologist performed ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International journal of clinical practice, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of non‐radiologist performed ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
International journal of clinical practice, May 2014
DOI 10.1111/ijcp.12453
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Concannon, S. McHugh, D. A. Healy, E. Kavanagh, P. Burke, M. Clarke Moloney, S. R. Walsh

Abstract

Ultrasonography is increasingly used by clinicians to identify abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the accuracy of non-radiologist performed ultrasound (NRPUS) for AAA disease to the 'gold standard' of radiologist performed aortic imaging (RPI), intra-operative findings or postmortem findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 25%