| Title |
Are Restorative Justice Conferences Effective in Reducing Repeat Offending? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10940-014-9222-9 |
| Authors |
Lawrence W. Sherman, Heather Strang, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Daniel J. Woods, Barak Ariel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 213 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 53 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 99 | 46% |
| Psychology | 30 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#776,571
of 24,242,692 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#31
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,573
of 228,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,242,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.