| Title |
Functions of behavior change interventions when implementing multi-professional teamwork at an emergency department: a comparative case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-218 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mandus Frykman, Henna Hasson, Åsa Muntlin Athlin, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz |
| Abstract |
While there is strong support for the benefits of working in multi-professional teams in health care, the implementation of multi-professional teamwork is reported to be complex and challenging. Implementation strategies combining multiple behavior change interventions are recommended, but the understanding of how and why the behavior change interventions influence staff behavior is limited. There is a lack of studies focusing on the functions of different behavior change interventions and the mechanisms driving behavior change. In this study, applied behavior analysis is used to analyze the function and impact of different behavior change interventions when implementing multi-professional teamwork. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,453
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,872
of 226,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#108
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.