↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Sensors of Blood Flow in Endothelial Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Molecular Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Sensors of Blood Flow in Endothelial Cells
Published in
Trends in Molecular Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.07.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Baratchi, Khashayar Khoshmanesh, Owen L. Woodman, Simon Potocnik, Karlheinz Peter, Peter McIntyre

Abstract

Mechanical stress from blood flow has a significant effect on endothelial physiology, with a key role in initiating vasoregulatory signals. Disturbances in blood flow, such as in regions of disease-associated stenosis, arterial branch points, and sharp turns, can induce proatherogenic phenotypes in endothelial cells. The disruption of vascular homeostasis as a result of endothelial dysfunction may contribute to early and late stages of atherosclerosis, the underlying cause of coronary artery disease. In-depth knowledge of the mechanobiology of endothelial cells is essential to identifying mechanosensory complexes involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. In this review, we describe different blood flow patterns and summarize current knowledge on mechanosensory molecules regulating endothelial vasoregulatory functions, with clinical implications. Such information may help in the search for novel therapeutic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 25%
Student > Master 26 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 14%
Engineering 28 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Chemical Engineering 7 3%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 52 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,483,169
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#947
of 1,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,163
of 327,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.