↓ Skip to main content

The double crush syndrome revisited - A Delphi study to reveal current expert views on mechanisms underlying dual nerve disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The double crush syndrome revisited - A Delphi study to reveal current expert views on mechanisms underlying dual nerve disorders
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, June 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2011.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annina B. Schmid, Michel W. Coppieters

Abstract

A high prevalence of dual nerve disorders is frequently reported. How a secondary nerve disorder may develop following a primary nerve disorder remains largely unknown. Although still frequently cited, most explanatory theories were formulated many years ago. Considering recent advances in neuroscience, it is uncertain whether these theories still reflect current expert opinion. A Delphi study was conducted to update views on potential mechanisms underlying dual nerve disorders. In three rounds, seventeen international experts in the field of peripheral nerve disorders were asked to list possible mechanisms and rate their plausibility. Mechanisms with a median plausibility rating of ≥7 out of 10 were considered highly plausible. The experts identified fourteen mechanisms associated with a first nerve disorder that may predispose to the development of another nerve disorder. Of these fourteen mechanisms, nine have not previously been linked to double crush. Four mechanisms were considered highly plausible (impaired axonal transport, ion channel up or downregulation, inflammation in the dorsal root ganglia and neuroma-in-continuity). Eight additional mechanisms were listed which are not triggered by a primary nerve disorder, but may render the nervous system more vulnerable to multiple nerve disorders, such as systemic diseases and neurotoxic medication. Even though many mechanisms were classified as plausible or highly plausible, overall plausibility ratings varied widely. Experts indicated that a wide range of mechanisms has to be considered to better understand dual nerve disorders. Previously listed theories cannot be discarded, but may be insufficient to explain the high prevalence of dual nerve disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 162 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Other 26 15%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 45 26%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 22%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 27 16%