| Title |
Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-011-2236-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sang Hee Park, Woo Kyung Moon, Nariya Cho, Jung Min Chang, Seock-Ah Im, In Ae Park, Keon Wook Kang, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh |
| Abstract |
To compare the use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 28% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 71% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2011.
All research outputs
#20,143,522
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,283
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,811
of 106,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.