↓ Skip to main content

Cuttlefish use visual cues to control three-dimensional skin papillae for camouflage

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Cuttlefish use visual cues to control three-dimensional skin papillae for camouflage
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00359-009-0430-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justine J. Allen, Lydia M. Mäthger, Alexandra Barbosa, Roger T. Hanlon

Abstract

Cephalopods (octopus, squid and cuttlefish) are known for their camouflage. Cuttlefish Sepia officinalis use chromatophores and light reflectors for color change, and papillae to change three-dimensional physical skin texture. Papillae vary in size, shape and coloration; nine distinct sets of papillae are described here. The objective was to determine whether cuttlefish use visual or tactile cues to control papillae expression. Cuttlefish were placed on natural substrates to evoke the three major camouflage body patterns: Uniform/Stipple, Mottle and Disruptive. Three versions of each substrate were presented: the actual substrate, the actual substrate covered with glass (removes tactile information) and a laminated photograph of the substrate (removes tactile and three-dimensional information because depth-of-field information is unavailable). No differences in Small dorsal papillae or Major lateral mantle papillae expression were observed among the three versions of each substrate. Thus, visual (not tactile) cues drive the expression of papillae in S. officinalis. Two sets of papillae (Major lateral mantle papillae and Major lateral eye papillae) showed irregular responses; their control requires future investigation. Finally, more Small dorsal papillae were shown in Uniform/Stipple and Mottle patterns than in Disruptive patterns, which may provide clues regarding the visual mechanisms of background matching versus disruptive coloration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 157 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 42%
Engineering 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,418,890
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#136
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,711
of 109,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them