Title |
Using direct clinical observation to assess the quality of cesarean delivery in Afghanistan: an exploratory study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-176 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cherrie Lynn Evans, Young Mi Kim, Khalid Yari, Nasratullah Ansari, Hannah Tappis |
Abstract |
As part of a National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Needs Assessment, a special study was undertaken in July 2010 to examine the quality of cesarean deliveries in Afghanistan and examine the utility of direct clinical observation as an assessment method in low-resource settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Chile | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 47% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#13,859,387
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,536
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,990
of 229,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#56
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.