↓ Skip to main content

The Role of the Institutional Review Board in Public Health Research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of the Institutional Review Board in Public Health Research
Published in
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, July 2014
DOI 10.1097/phh.0000000000000099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia MacCubbin, Justin B. Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
#2,042
of 2,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,665
of 242,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.