You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Documenting contamination in ancient starch laboratories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.023 |
| Authors |
Alison Crowther, Michael Haslam, Nikki Oakden, Dale Walde, Julio Mercader |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 25% |
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 30 | 27% |
| Arts and Humanities | 29 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#2,305
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,745
of 252,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#57
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.