↓ Skip to main content

Animals living in polluted environments are a potential source of anti-tumor molecule(s)

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Animals living in polluted environments are a potential source of anti-tumor molecule(s)
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3410-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shareni Jeyamogan, Naveed Ahmed Khan, Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui

Abstract

Despite advances in therapeutic interventions and supportive care, the morbidity and mortality associated with cancer have remained significant. Thus, there is a need for newer and more powerful anti-tumor agents. The search for new anti-tumor compounds originating from natural resources is a promising research area. Animals living in polluted environments are a potent source of anti-tumor agents. Under polluted milieus, species such as crocodiles, feed on rotten meat, are exposed to heavy metals, endure high levels of radiation, and are among the very few species to survive the catastrophic Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event with a prolonged lifespan. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that animals such as crocodiles have developed mechanisms to defend themselves against cancer. The discovery of antitumor activity in animals such as crocodiles, whales, sharks, etc. will stimulate research in finding therapeutic molecules from unusual sources, and has potential for the development of novel antitumor compound(s) that may also overcome current drug resistance. Nevertheless, intensive research in the next few years will be required to realize these expectations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,329,910
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2,056
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,027
of 328,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.