↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced human receptor binding by H5 haemagglutinins

Overview of attention for article published in Virology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhanced human receptor binding by H5 haemagglutinins
Published in
Virology, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.virol.2014.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoli Xiong, Haixia Xiao, Stephen R. Martin, Peter J. Coombs, Junfeng Liu, Patrick J. Collins, Sebastien G. Vachieri, Philip A. Walker, Yi Pu Lin, John W. McCauley, Steven J. Gamblin, John J. Skehel

Abstract

Mutant H5N1 influenza viruses have been isolated from humans that have increased human receptor avidity. We have compared the receptor binding properties of these mutants with those of wild-type viruses, and determined the structures of their haemagglutinins in complex with receptor analogues. Mutants from Vietnam bind tighter to human receptor by acquiring basic residues near the receptor binding site. They bind more weakly to avian receptor because they lack specific interactions between Asn-186 and Gln-226. In contrast, a double mutant, Δ133/Ile155Thr, isolated in Egypt has greater avidity for human receptor while retaining wild-type avidity for avian receptor. Despite these increases in human receptor binding, none of the mutants prefers human receptor, unlike aerosol transmissible H5N1 viruses. Nevertheless, mutants with high avidity for both human and avian receptors may be intermediates in the evolution of H5N1 viruses that could infect both humans and poultry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Chemistry 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,574,947
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Virology
#346
of 9,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,340
of 239,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.