You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does recovery planning improve the status of threatened species?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.02.008 |
| Authors |
Madeleine C. Bottrill, Jessica C. Walsh, James E.M. Watson, Liana N. Joseph, Alejandro Ortega-Argueta, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 230 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 87 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 87 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,329,832
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,845
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,257
of 121,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.