↓ Skip to main content

Role of wildlife in the epidemiology of Leishmania infantum infection in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Role of wildlife in the epidemiology of Leishmania infantum infection in Europe
Published in
Parasitology Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00436-014-3929-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Millán, Ezio Ferroglio, Laia Solano-Gallego

Abstract

Although dogs are considered the main reservoir of Leishmania infantum infection in endemic areas in Europe, the existence of other wild vertebrate reservoirs has been proposed as a possible cause of the lack of success of control measures. Evidence of L. infantum infection in European wildlife has been reported in carnivores, lagomorphs, and rodents. The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) received most attention, probably due to its taxonomic relationship with the dog and because it is the most abundant wild carnivore in Europe. Foxes and other wild carnivores often displayed high prevalences of infection but their infectiveness to the sandfly vector has never been demonstrated. However, xenodiagnosis demonstrated that black rats (Rattus rattus), are infectious to sandflies. This, together with their relative abundance, high rates of infection, and the fact that infected rats have been found on a Mediterranean island where dogs are not present, makes rats good candidate to be reservoirs of L. infantum. Recently, the Iberian hare (Lepus granatensis) has been recognized as the origin of a leishmaniosis outbreak in humans in Spain and xenodiagnosis showed that this species is also able to infect sandflies. In contrast, a recent survey in cave bats failed to detect infected individuals. In the future, the comparison of parasite isolates from humans, dogs and wildlife, xenodiagnosis studies in wild carnivores, and the study of other vertebrate taxonomic groups will help determine the current role of European wildlife in the epidemiology of leishmaniosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 50 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 43 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,982,297
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#421
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,987
of 227,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#5
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.