Title |
A survey of Canadian anesthesiologists’ preferences in difficult intubation and “cannot intubate, cannot ventilate” situations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12630-014-0183-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David T. Wong, Arpan Mehta, Amanda D. Tam, Brian Yau, Jean Wong |
Abstract |
The purpose of this survey was to determine the equipment that anesthesiologists prefer in difficult tracheal intubation and "cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" (CICV) situations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 29% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 71% |
Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,138,639
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#505
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,103
of 241,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.