↓ Skip to main content

Biological monitoring by citizens using Web-based photographic databases of fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Biological monitoring by citizens using Web-based photographic databases of fishes
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0724-4
Authors

Yusuke Miyazaki, Atsunobu Murase, Masato Shiina, Kenichi Naoe, Ryosuke Nakashiro, Junichi Honda, Junichiro Yamaide, Hiroshi Senou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Indonesia 1 2%
France 1 2%
India 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 37 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 39%
Environmental Science 16 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,305,949
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#521
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,013
of 229,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.