Title |
Endoscopic Management of Early Esophageal Neoplasia: an Emerging Standard
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11605-011-1618-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kelly M Galey, Candice L Wilshire, Thomas J Watson, Marabel D Schneider, Vivek Kaul, Carolyn E Jones, Virginia R Litle, Asad Ullah, Jeffrey H Peters |
Abstract |
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and ablation technologies have markedly changed the treatment of early esophageal neoplasia. We analyzed treatment and outcomes of patients undergoing multimodal endoscopic treatment of early esophageal neoplasia at our institution. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 30% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 48% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2011.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1,191
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,376
of 130,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.