↓ Skip to main content

Demonizing in Children’s Television Cartoons and Disney Animated Films

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Demonizing in Children’s Television Cartoons and Disney Animated Films
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10578-006-0016-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory Fouts, Mitchell Callan, Kelly Piasentin, Andrea Lawson

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of demonizing in the two major media that young children use (television and movies). Two content analyses were conducted using the animated feature films (n = 34) of the Walt Disney Company and after-school cartoons (n = 41). Each was coded for the modeling of the use of "evil" words when referring to a person, e.g., monster, devil, demon, wicked. Seventy-four percent of the Disney films contained "evil" references, with an average of 5.6 references per film. Forty-four percent of the after-school cartoons contained "evil" references, with an average of one per cartoon. The results are discussed within the context of children's repeated exposure to popular animated movies and cartoons and their learning to demonize people who engage in perceived "bad" behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 2 2%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 99 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 22%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 21%
Psychology 22 21%
Arts and Humanities 12 11%
Linguistics 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,557,472
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#78
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,020
of 80,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.