↓ Skip to main content

Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson’s “feelies”

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson’s “feelies”
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3220-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Farley Norman, Flip Phillips, Jessica S. Holmin, Hideko F. Norman, Amanda M. Beers, Alexandria M. Boswell, Jacob R. Cheeseman, Angela G. Stethen, Cecilia Ronning

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 37%
Neuroscience 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,813,242
of 23,847,468 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#740
of 3,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,457
of 171,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,847,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.