↓ Skip to main content

Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder among Incarcerated Men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder among Incarcerated Men
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11524-014-9871-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy Wolff, Jessica Huening, Jing Shi, B. Christopher Frueh

Abstract

Trauma exposure and trauma-related symptoms are prevalent among incarcerated men, suggesting a need for behavioral health intervention. A random sample of adult males (N = 592) residing in a single high-security prison were screened for trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Trauma was a universal experience among incarcerated men. Rates of current PTSD symptoms and lifetime PTSD were significantly higher (30 to 60 %) than rates found in the general male populations (3 to 6 %). Lifetime rates of trauma and PTSD were associated with psychiatric disorders. This study suggests the need for a gender-sensitive response to trauma among incarcerated men with modification for comorbid mental disorders and type of trauma exposure. Developing gender-sensitive trauma interventions for incarcerated men and testing them is necessary to improve the behavioral health outcomes of incarcerated men who disproportionately return to urban communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 30%
Social Sciences 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#579,101
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#93
of 1,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,296
of 231,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.