↓ Skip to main content

The optokinetic response in wild type and white zebra finches

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The optokinetic response in wild type and white zebra finches
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00359-008-0358-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis Eckmeier, Hans-Joachim Bischof

Abstract

Optic flow is a main source of information about self movement and the three-dimensional composition of the environment during locomotion. It is processed by the accessory optic system in all vertebrates. The optokinetic response is elicited by rotational optic flow, e.g. in a rotating drum lined with vertical stripes. We investigated here the effect of rotational optic flow on the optokinetic response in wild type and white zebra finches. The highest stimulus velocity eliciting an optokinetic response (upper velocity threshold) was dependent on stimulus direction and illumination level, but was not different between the colour morphs. The upper velocity threshold was higher with temporal to nasal movements in monocularly exposed birds and symmetrical with binocular exposure. Its increase with illumination level followed Fechner's law and reached a plateau at about 560 Lux. In bright daylight, white birds did not show optokinetic responses. We conclude that the altered wiring of the visual system of white birds has no influence on accessory optic system function. The unwillingness of white birds to respond with optokinetic response in bright daylight may be due to a substantial lack of inhibition within the visual system as demonstrated earlier, which may enhance the sensibility to glare.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Portugal 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 24 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 42%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1,059
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,976
of 83,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.