↓ Skip to main content

Histoplasmosis in HIV-Infected Patients: A Review of New Developments and Remaining Gaps

Overview of attention for article published in Current Tropical Medicine Reports, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 141)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Histoplasmosis in HIV-Infected Patients: A Review of New Developments and Remaining Gaps
Published in
Current Tropical Medicine Reports, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40475-014-0017-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine A. Adenis, Christine Aznar, Pierre Couppié

Abstract

Histoplasma capsulatum is responsible for histoplasmosis, a fungal disease with worldwide distribution that can affect both immunocompromised and imunocompetent individuals. During the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, morbidity and mortality due to histoplasmosis remained a public heatlh problem in low-income and high-income countries. The true burden of HIV-associated histoplasmosis is either not fully known or neglected since it is not a notifiable disease. Progress has been made in DNA patterns of strains and understanding of pathogenesis, and hopefully these will help identify new therapeutic targets. Unfortunately, histoplasmosis is still widely mistaken for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, leading to numerous avoidable deaths, even if they are easily distinguishable. The new diagnostic tools and therapeutics developments have still not been made available in most endemic regions. Still, recent developments are promising because of their good clinical characteristics and also because they will be commercially available and affordable. This review of published data and gaps may help define and guide future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 191 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 53 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 61 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,502,830
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Current Tropical Medicine Reports
#49
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,847
of 226,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Tropical Medicine Reports
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.