↓ Skip to main content

The future of general practice in China: from ‘barefoot doctors’ to GPs?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The future of general practice in China: from ‘barefoot doctors’ to GPs?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, May 2014
DOI 10.3399/bjgp14x679933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nigel Mathers, Yu–Chu Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Lecturer 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,801
of 4,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,055
of 226,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#54
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.