↓ Skip to main content

Allelopathic potential of Cambodian rice lines under field conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Weed Biology & Management, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allelopathic potential of Cambodian rice lines under field conditions
Published in
Weed Biology & Management, November 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2009.00350.x
Authors

SOPHEA PHENG, MARIA OLOFSDOTTER, GARY JAHN, HARRY NESBITT, STEVE W. ADKINS

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Lecturer 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 47%
Unspecified 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Weed Biology & Management
#20
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,732
of 178,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Weed Biology & Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them