↓ Skip to main content

A combinatorial approach to the design of vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Biology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
A combinatorial approach to the design of vaccines
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00285-014-0797-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Martínez, Martin Milanič, Leire Legarreta, Paul Medvedev, Iker Malaina, Ildefonso M. de la Fuente

Abstract

We present two new problems of combinatorial optimization and discuss their applications to the computational design of vaccines. In the shortest [Formula: see text]-superstring problem, given a family [Formula: see text] of strings over a finite alphabet, a set [Formula: see text] of "target" strings over that alphabet, and an integer [Formula: see text], the task is to find a string of minimum length containing, for each [Formula: see text], at least [Formula: see text] target strings as substrings of [Formula: see text]. In the shortest [Formula: see text]-cover superstring problem, given a collection [Formula: see text] of finite sets of strings over a finite alphabet and an integer [Formula: see text], the task is to find a string of minimum length containing, for each [Formula: see text], at least [Formula: see text] elements of [Formula: see text] as substrings. The two problems are polynomially equivalent, and the shortest [Formula: see text]-cover superstring problem is a common generalization of two well known combinatorial optimization problems, the shortest common superstring problem and the set cover problem. We present two approaches to obtain exact or approximate solutions to the shortest [Formula: see text]-superstring and [Formula: see text]-cover superstring problems: one based on integer programming, and a hill-climbing algorithm. An application is given to the computational design of vaccines and the algorithms are applied to experimental data taken from patients infected by H5N1 and HIV-1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Mathematics 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Engineering 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,161,750
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#140
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,683
of 231,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.