↓ Skip to main content

Risk Adjustment in ALPPS Is Associated With a Dramatic Decrease in Early Mortality and Morbidity

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Adjustment in ALPPS Is Associated With a Dramatic Decrease in Early Mortality and Morbidity
Published in
Annals of Surgery, November 2017
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000002446
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Linecker, Bergthor Björnsson, Gregor A. Stavrou, Karl J. Oldhafer, Georg Lurje, Ulf Neumann, René Adam, Francois-René Pruvot, Stefan A. Topp, Jun Li, Ivan Capobianco, Silvio Nadalin, Marcel Autran Machado, Sergey Voskanyan, Deniz Balci, Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro, Fernando A. Alvarez, Eduardo De Santibañes, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Massimo Malagó, Michelle L. de Oliveira, Mickael Lesurtel, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Henrik Petrowsky

Abstract

To longitudinally assess whether risk adjustment in Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) occurred over time and is associated with postoperative outcome. ALPPS is a novel 2-stage hepatectomy enabling resection of extensive hepatic tumors. ALPPS has been criticized for its high mortality, which is reported beyond accepted standards in liver surgery. Therefore, adjustments in patient selection and technique have been performed but have not yet been studied over time in relation to outcome. ALPPS centers of the International ALPPS Registry having performed ≥10 cases over a period of ≥3 years were assessed for 90-day mortality and major interstage complications (≥3b) of the longitudinal study period from 2009 to 2015. The predicted prestage 1 and 2 mortality risks were calculated for each patient. In addition, questionnaires were sent to all centers exploring center-specific risk adjustment strategies. Among 437 patients from 16 centers, a shift in indications toward colorectal liver metastases from 53% to 77% and a reverse trend in biliary tumors from 24% to 9% were observed. Over time, 90-day mortality decreased from initially 17% to 4% in 2015 (P = 0.002). Similarly, major interstage complications decreased from 10% to 3% (P = 0.011). The reduction of 90-day mortality was independently associated with a risk adjustment in patient selection (P < 0.001; OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.36-1.93) and using less invasive techniques in stage-1 surgery (P = 0.019; OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18-0.86). A survey indicated risk adjustment of patient selection in all centers and ALPPS technique in the majority (80%) of centers. Risk adjustment of patient selection and technique in ALPPS resulted in a continuous drop of early mortality and major postoperative morbidity, which has meanwhile reached standard outcome measures accepted for major liver surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 12 16%
Professor 8 11%
Other 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Linguistics 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Energy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,338,341
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#2,217
of 9,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,131
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#46
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.