You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Catheter Position Tracking System Using Planar Magnetics and Closed Loop Current Control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1109/tmag.2014.2304271 |
| Authors |
Kilian O’Donoghue, David Eustace, James Griffiths, Michael O’Shea, Timothy Power, Hilary Mansfield, Padraig Cantillon-Murphy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 30 | 71% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,200,244
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
#906
of 5,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,104
of 227,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,939 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.