You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating Stocking Efficacy in an Ecosystem Undergoing Oligotrophication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-017-0173-5 |
| Authors |
Yu-Chun Kao, Mark W. Rogers, David B. Bunnell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 55% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 34% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#640,784
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#28
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,740
of 321,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.