↓ Skip to main content

Methadone Treatment for HIV Prevention—Feasibility, Retention, and Predictors of Attrition in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methadone Treatment for HIV Prevention—Feasibility, Retention, and Predictors of Attrition in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2014
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciu382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barrot H. Lambdin, Frank Masao, Olivia Chang, Pamela Kaduri, Jessie Mbwambo, Ayoub Magimba, Norman Sabuni, R. Douglas Bruce

Abstract

 People who inject drugs (PWID) in Dar es Salaam have an estimated HIV prevalence of 42%-50% compared to 6.9% among the general population. Extensive evidence supports methadone maintenance to lower morbidity, mortality and transmission of HIV and other infectious diseases among PWID. In 2011, the Tanzanian government launched the first publicly funded methadone clinic on the mainland of sub-Saharan Africa at Muhimbili National Hospital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 9 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 30%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 49 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#12,607,342
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#11,056
of 15,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,159
of 226,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#120
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.