↓ Skip to main content

Smoking cessation and bone healing: optimal cessation timing

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Smoking cessation and bone healing: optimal cessation timing
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00590-014-1488-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy Truntzer, Bryan Vopat, Michael Feldstein, Amir Matityahu

Abstract

Smoking is a worldwide epidemic. Complications related to smoking behavior generate an economic loss around $193 billion annually. In addition to impacting chronic health conditions, smoking is linked to increased perioperative complications in those with current or previous smoking history. Numerous studies have demonstrated more frequent surgical complications including higher rates of infection, poor wound healing, heightened pain complaints, and increased pulmonary morbidities in patients with a smoking history. Longer preoperative cessation periods also seem to correlate with reduced rates. At roughly 4 weeks of cessation prior to surgery, complication rates more closely reflect individuals without a smoking history in comparison with those that smoke within 4 weeks of surgery. In the musculoskeletal system, a similar trend has been observed in smokers with higher rates of fractures, nonunions, malunions, infections, osteomyelitis, and lower functional scores compared to non-smoking patients. Unfortunately, the present literature lacks robust data suggesting a temporal relationship between smoking cessation and bone healing. In our review, we analyze pseudoarthrosis rates following spinal fusion to suggest that bone healing in the context of smoking behavior follows a similar time sequence as observed in wound healing. We also discuss the implications for further clarity on bone healing and smoking cessation within orthopedics including improved risk stratification and better identification of circumstances where adjunct therapy is appropriate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2015.
All research outputs
#12,931,497
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#229
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,097
of 228,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.