↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive ageing surgeons

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive ageing surgeons
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, February 2014
DOI 10.1111/ans.12506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmelle Peisah, Chanaka Wijeratne, Bruce Waxman, Marianne Vonau

Abstract

The surgical workforce is ageing. This will impact on future workforce supply and planning, as well as the professional performance and welfare of surgeons themselves. This paper is a 'call to arms' to surgeons to consider the complex problem of advancing years and surgical performance. We aim to promote discussion about the issue of ageing as it relates to surgeons, while exploring ways in which successful ageing in surgeons may be promoted. The task-specific aspects of surgical practice suggest that it is a physically and cognitively demanding task, reliant on a range of fine motor, sensory, visuospatial, reasoning, memory and processing skills. Many of these skills potentially decline with age, although there is great inter-individual variation, particularly in cognitive performance. Nevertheless, there is some consensus in the literature that age-related cognitive changes exist in a proportion of surgeons, and there is an increase in operative mortality rates for certain surgical procedures performed by older and more experienced surgeons. In the absence of mandatory retirement, guidance is needed in regard to individualizing the timing of retirement and encouraging reflective and adaptive practice based on insight into how one's skills and performance may change with age. This may be best facilitated by some form of informed and guided self-monitoring or 'self-screening'. It should be emphasized that self-screening is not a form of self-treatment but aims to enhance insight, using a tool kit of resources to promote adaptive ageing. Moreover, self-screening should not be restricted to cognition, which is only part of the picture of ageing, but extended to emphasize the maintenance of mental and physical wellness, and the acceptance of independent professional treatment and support when required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Psychology 4 11%
Philosophy 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2014.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#1,270
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,268
of 345,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.