↓ Skip to main content

A study to assess inhaler technique and its potential impact on asthma control in patients attending an asthma clinic

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A study to assess inhaler technique and its potential impact on asthma control in patients attending an asthma clinic
Published in
Journal of Asthma, January 2014
DOI 10.3109/02770903.2013.876650
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. M. Harnett, E. B. Hunt, B. R. Bowen, O. J. O’Connell, D. M. Edgeworth, P. Mitchell, J. A. Eustace, M. T. Henry, M. P. Kennedy, B. J. Plant, D. M. Murphy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate inhaler technique and symptom control in patients with poorly controlled asthma at baseline and at follow-up in a dedicated asthma clinic in a tertiary hospital. We also investigated the impact of asthma on these patients' quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Unspecified 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2016.
All research outputs
#12,839,523
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma
#1,044
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,725
of 306,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma
#25
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.